IndiaThe decision to introduce Frog frog as a substitute for brain shock to Shivam Dube During the fourth T20i against England in Pune He has caused a great debate in the world of Crickt.
Controversy about the inclusion of frog as a substitute for brain shock
The party saw Dube play a fundamental role, breaking 53 of 34 balls, since India established a competitive total of 181/9. However, in the final of the entrances of India, Dube was beaten in the helmet by a Craig Overton Buncer, forcing him to leave the field under brain shock protocols. In a movement that has since drawn a great scrutiny, India replaced it with Frog frogA quick medium bowling player, instead of a similar SUV.
Rana had an instant impact, delivering a 33 winners of 33 in its debut in T20i. Your crucial advances, including Liam Livingstone, Jacob Bethell and Craig Overton -He waited to India Bowl England to leave for 166, ensuring a 15 -run victory. With this victory, India took an impregnable 3-1 advantage in the series before the final match in Mumbai. England captain Jos Buttler He did not stop in questioning the movement of India, openly stating that Rana was not a similar replacement for Dube.
Ravichandran Ashwin’s position on India’s decision
Indian turn legend Ravichandran Ashwin He has now expressed his strong disapproval of the decision, criticizing both party officials and the management of the situation by the Indian team. Speaking on his YouTube channel, Ashwin did not put his words, comparing the decision with the rule of the IPL impact players instead of an international Crick regulation.
“The game is made. India captures another series at home. T20I has been a true giant of a victory. What was this game? It was like an ipl replica. Supersub was there, and the game was played with an impact player “, Ashwin commented, expressing his disbelief for the situation.
In addition, he referred to the 2020 brain shock replacement incident in Canberra, where Yuzvendra Chahal replaced Ravindra Jadeje after the latter suffered a brain shock. Ashwin said that at least in that case, a Spinner was replaced by another Spinner, so it is a reasonable decision. In contrast, bringing a pacemaker for an all -terrain batting like Dube seemed completely unjustified.
“All the discussion is about how frog arrived as a substitute for Shivam Dube’s brain shock. Do we forget that it was an international game and play an IPL game? I can understand. It has happened in the past. Ravindra Jadeja was shocked in Canberra, and Yuzvendra Chahal entered as a substitute. I don’t understand this. At least previously, Chahal entered for Jadeja, a roulette for a spinner “, The 38 -year -old man declared.
Read also: India follow the CPI rules by replacing Shivam Dube with Harshit frog during the 4th T20i against England? Explained
Ashwin’s perspective in Ramandeep Singh as a possible replacement
Ashwin strongly criticized party officials, arguing that Ramandeep SinghAn all -terrain of batting, it was a perfect replacement for Dube, but ignored. Ashwin also emphasized that this decision established a dangerous precedent, since it could allow the teams to exploit the rule of brain shock in future parties.
“Here, he arrived at Shivam Dube. There is no role in the Indian or England team. If there is no one in the squad, then you can say that Rana Harshit can hit a little and Shivam Dube can play a little. That’s why we brought it. RamandeEp Singh, as a replacement for Ramandeep Singh, to sit outside. I don’t understand. This is a case of pure cricket calculation error, either by the referees or in the part of the party’s referee. Ramandeep Singh was there, as for Shivam Dube. But not him. Harshit Rana was chosen as a substitute for brain shock. I think that people in charge should investigate this “, Ashwin concluded.