Workout
Healthy Eating
Meditation
Podcast
Authenticity
Social Service
About Us
Review Board
Editorial Process
Contact Us
Health Tracker
AI Tools
✔Fact Checked

The captain of England, Jos Buttle

Captain of England Yes Buttler expressed his dissatisfaction with India’s decision to introduce Frog frog as a substitute for brain shock to Shivam Dube During the fourth T20i game in Pune, that the hosts won the game for 15 races, ensuring an impregnable 3-1 advantage in the series.

Dube, who played a crucial coup of 53 races of 34 balls, was beaten in the helmet for a Jamie OvertonThe delivery in the final of the entries of India. After being evaluated by medical staff and, subsequently, not taking the field for the persecution of England, Rana was hired as a substitute for brain shock. Rana had an immediate impact, claiming 3 WICKETS for 33 races and playing a decisive role in the victory of India.

Jos Buttler criticizes the replacement ‘as equal’

During the press conference after the party, Buttler disagreed with replacement, questioning his adhesion to International Cricket Council (ICC) Rules for brain shock replacements.

“Or Shivam Dube has put around 25 mph with the ball or severely improved his batting. It is not a similar replacement, we do not agree with that. It is part of the game; I still think we should have won the game, but we do not agree with the decision. “ Buttler declared.

In particular, the substitute guidelines for the CPI’s brain shock stipulate that the replacement player must be a similar substitute that does not provide the team with an improper advantage. However, the coincidence referee Javagal Srinath He approved the application of Rana India as Dube’s replacement, which led to the controversy.

Also read: Triple Wickt Maiden: England Pacer Saqib Mahmood achieves a unique feat in the 4th T20i against India

Lack of consultation combines frustration

Buttler also highlighted the lack of communication between officials and the management of the England team regarding the decision, emphasizing that such a crucial ruling should have been discussed with both teams in advance. He expressed his disappointment for having been informed about the substitution only after he had already been approved and implemented, leaving England without the opportunity to raise objections or seek clarifications in real time.

“There were no consultations. When I went to Bat, I asked the referee why Harshit was in the field, and he said it is the submarine of brain shock, so I was quite confused. “ Butterler commented.

The incident has triggered a debate on the interpretation of the substitute rule of brain shock. Former England Cricket players, including Kevin Pietersen and Alastair CookThey have also questioned the decision, emphasizing the disparity between Dube, an all -terrain combat, and frog, a fast -specialized bowling player with limited batting capacity in the Cricket T20.

India defends the decision

Indian bowling coach, Morne MorkelHe defended the movement of the team, stating that the decision was made only based on Dube’s health concerns. He also declared that he was finally the referee of the party to approve the substitution.

With the controversy gaining impulse, the discussions surrounding the substitute rule of brain shock and its implementation is likely to continue, adding another layer of intrigue to the current series.

Also read: Internet users get more crazy like Ravi Bishnoi, Harshit Rana takes India to a victory in the series over England in the 4th T20i



Source link

Last reviewed on

Expert Q&A

Ask a Question
Share Now:

Was this article helpful?

🤓

😕

dotdash removebg preview

FitToFar is part of the Dotdash Meredith publishing family.

Please review our updated Terms of Service.

BE THE FIRST TO KNOW

SUBSCRIBE TO GET LATEST FITNESS AND NUTRITION UPDATES!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

The FitToFar News team takes pride in providing readers with accurate, properly sourced, and objectively analyzed content. Each news piece is stringently fact-checked by our Integrity Network, and any form of plagiarism or malicious behavior from our authors and contributors is strictly forbidden.

Our articles follow a number of key standards:

  • Each cited research and studies should come from renowned peer-reviewed journals or educational bodies. Additionally, any quoted data and figures must be traceable to its origin, while also detailing their significance.

  • Content related to treatment, medicine, and procedure must plainly specify availability, cost, possible side effects, targets, possible interactions, and unapproved usage (if relevant).

  • Every news article should have inputs from at least two authorized professionals, with corresponding qualifications and ties to appropriate associations or works.

  • The reader must be made aware of any potential conflict of interest relating to the source or study.

  • Finally, all news pieces should be supplied with enough background and context regarding the relevant topic or condition.

 

BE THE FIRST TO KNOW

SUBSCRIBE TO GET LATEST FITNESS AND NUTRITION UPDATES!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.