Workout
Healthy Eating
Meditation
Podcast
Authenticity
Social Service
About Us
Review Board
Editorial Process
Contact Us
Health Tracker
AI Tools
✔Fact Checked

Did India follow the CPI rules in the replacement of Shivam Dube with a hard frog during the 4th T20i against England? Explained

The fourth t20i between India and England In Pune, it was not only a Crickt action, but also an important controversy with respect to the substitute rule of brain shock. The choice of India to bring Frog frog as a replacement Shivam Dube He drew criticism, with the patron of England Yes Buttler questioning whether the decision aligned with the regulations of the ICC.

The controversial decision raises questions

During the final of the entrances of India, Dube was hit in the helmet for a delivery of Jamie Overton. After the medical examination, India announced that Pacer Rana would take his place under the substitute rule of brain shock. Rana had a significant impact with the ball, claiming three wickts for 33 races and playing a fundamental role in the triumph of 15 races of India.

However, England expressed concern about the legitimacy of substitution. Buttler argued that Rana, mainly a rhythm bowling player, was not an adequate replacement as for Dube, known for his batting pocket and occasional average rhythm.

Also read: Triple Wickt Maiden: England Pacer Saqib Mahmood achieves a unique feat in the 4th T20i against India

Was Harshit frog a true replacement of “as for”?

Several experts believe that replacing an all -terrain as Dube with a specialized bowling player as a frog provided an advantage to India. Former players like Kevin Pietersen and Alastair Cook It also intervened, which suggests that the decision contradicts the spirit of the rule.

The substitute rules of CPI’s brain shock are intended to maintain equity in the game ensuring that a replacement does not give a team an improper advantage. Clause 1.2.7.3 establishes that the substitute must be a similar player, which means that his inclusion should not significantly strengthen the team beyond what the shocked player offered. This prevents the equipment from using the rule strategically to gain an advantage.

Meanwhile, clause 1.2.7.7 grants the final authority to approve or reject a replacement for brain shock, without any option for the teams to challenge the decision, ensuring that the disputes do not interrupt the party.

Clause 1.2.7.3: “A replacement for brain shock must be a comparable player whose inclusion does not provide a significant advantage for the team for the rest of the game.” This rule ensures that the equipment does not exploit the brain shock replacement process.

Clause 1.2.7.7: “The decision of the party referee with respect to a replacement for brain shock is final, and the teams cannot appeal against it.”

Also read: England captain Jos Buttle



Source link

Last reviewed on

Expert Q&A

Ask a Question
Share Now:

Was this article helpful?

🤓

😕

dotdash removebg preview

FitToFar is part of the Dotdash Meredith publishing family.

Please review our updated Terms of Service.

BE THE FIRST TO KNOW

SUBSCRIBE TO GET LATEST FITNESS AND NUTRITION UPDATES!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

The FitToFar News team takes pride in providing readers with accurate, properly sourced, and objectively analyzed content. Each news piece is stringently fact-checked by our Integrity Network, and any form of plagiarism or malicious behavior from our authors and contributors is strictly forbidden.

Our articles follow a number of key standards:

  • Each cited research and studies should come from renowned peer-reviewed journals or educational bodies. Additionally, any quoted data and figures must be traceable to its origin, while also detailing their significance.

  • Content related to treatment, medicine, and procedure must plainly specify availability, cost, possible side effects, targets, possible interactions, and unapproved usage (if relevant).

  • Every news article should have inputs from at least two authorized professionals, with corresponding qualifications and ties to appropriate associations or works.

  • The reader must be made aware of any potential conflict of interest relating to the source or study.

  • Finally, all news pieces should be supplied with enough background and context regarding the relevant topic or condition.

 

BE THE FIRST TO KNOW

SUBSCRIBE TO GET LATEST FITNESS AND NUTRITION UPDATES!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.