Workout
Healthy Eating
Meditation
Podcast
Authenticity
Social Service
About Us
Review Board
Editorial Process
Contact Us
Health Tracker
AI Tools
✔Fact Checked

The president of La Liga suggests that Real Madrid helped Barcelona in the Dani Olmo case

The president of LaLiga, Javier Tebas, has shown that he is not at all happy with the decision of the Ministry of Sports to grant Barcelona a precautionary measure, keeping Dani Olmo and Pau Víctor registered while their arguments develop. He has also pointed the finger in an unexpected direction.

On Wednesday afternoon, the CSD granted Barcelona an emergency appeal against the withdrawal of Dani Olmo and Pau Víctor, so they will be available until the case is resolved. It also prevents them from leaving for free as they could have done before it was granted to them.

A decision that was opposed by LaLiga and the RFEF, who released both players, effectively preventing them from playing the rest of the season. Tebas has now taken to Twitter/X to complain about the decision, but also point the finger at Real Madrid.

“The president of the CSD seems to listen to a single voice, which does not represent Spanish professional football. And that voice, curiously, maintains a complicit silence in this case. Where is Real Madrid TV now? (to be continued…,)”, explained Tebas after questioning the CSD’s reasoning.

Tebas explains that he is suspicious of the speed of the process, the lack of knowledge of previous decisions and the declaration of incompetence of one of the organizations. However, his suggestion that Real Madrid are involved does not occur in a vacuum.

Unofficially, Real Madrid are reported to have been supporting Barcelona’s attempt to register Olmo and Víctor, and certainly have not raised their voice against it, as other major clubs have done. Meanwhile, Real Madrid TV has been a constant tool to pressure La Liga and the RFEF over refereeing and other decisions, but has not complained about this matter.

Full post:

Chapter 1 of this tragicomedy

Many things are surprising about the recent precautionary measure:

1. Speed ​​of the process: An unusual speed that did not raise an opinion from either LaLiga or the RFEF.

2. Forget previous resolutions: Ignore previous decisions of both the CSD and the courts of law.

3. Declaration of incompetence of the Monitoring Committee: This decision demonstrates a profound lack of knowledge of how pre-approvals and quasi-final licenses are managed. Are there no prior agreements in these institutions?

Furthermore, there is no mention at any time of the articles of the RFEF regulations that prevented the granting of licenses to players, which is the key to the matter and not economic control. Was this an intentional omission?

It is clear that, with this precautionary measure, the CSD contradicts what is stated in the reasons for the Sports Law, which praise the economic control of LaLiga. This control, admired worldwide, has been key to saving numerous historic clubs from ruin and achieving an integrated competition on and off the field. However, the CSD questions it, once again showing a lack of knowledge of the effects of its decisions (which is not the first time).

For some time now, the CSD – and in particular its president, giving the appropriate instructions – seems to have the objective of dismantling the systems that operate in LaLiga and have the majority support of the clubs. The president of the CSD seems to listen to a single voice, which does not represent Spanish professional football. And that voice, curiously, maintains a complicit silence in this case. Where is Real Madrid TV now? (to be continued…)

Last reviewed on

Expert Q&A

Ask a Question
Share Now:

Was this article helpful?

🤓

😕

dotdash removebg preview

FitToFar is part of the Dotdash Meredith publishing family.

Please review our updated Terms of Service.

BE THE FIRST TO KNOW

SUBSCRIBE TO GET LATEST FITNESS AND NUTRITION UPDATES!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

The FitToFar News team takes pride in providing readers with accurate, properly sourced, and objectively analyzed content. Each news piece is stringently fact-checked by our Integrity Network, and any form of plagiarism or malicious behavior from our authors and contributors is strictly forbidden.

Our articles follow a number of key standards:

  • Each cited research and studies should come from renowned peer-reviewed journals or educational bodies. Additionally, any quoted data and figures must be traceable to its origin, while also detailing their significance.

  • Content related to treatment, medicine, and procedure must plainly specify availability, cost, possible side effects, targets, possible interactions, and unapproved usage (if relevant).

  • Every news article should have inputs from at least two authorized professionals, with corresponding qualifications and ties to appropriate associations or works.

  • The reader must be made aware of any potential conflict of interest relating to the source or study.

  • Finally, all news pieces should be supplied with enough background and context regarding the relevant topic or condition.

 

BE THE FIRST TO KNOW

SUBSCRIBE TO GET LATEST FITNESS AND NUTRITION UPDATES!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.