the recent Border-Gavaskar Trophy 2024-25 has sparked intense debate over the performance of Indian cricketers, particularly Shubman Gill. Once hailed as the next big thing in Indian cricket, Gill’s recent departures have raised eyebrows, with critics questioning his place in the team. A former Indian cricketer has also been vocal about his stance, calling Gill “overrated” and criticizing the selection committee for overlooking other deserving talents.
Shubman Gill’s disappointing performance in Australia
During the Border-Gavaskar Trophy, Gill’s batting was far from impressive. He achieved scores of 31, 28, 1, 20 and 13 in five innings, which is in stark contrast to the expectations set for a player of his caliber. While the focus has primarily been on veterans like Virat Kohli and Rohit SharmaGill’s inability to contribute meaningfully has not gone unnoticed. His sub-30 average in overseas conditions highlights a worrying trend for a player once seen as a potential match-winner.
ALSO READ: “Tell players like Rohit or Kohli…”: Yograj Singh insists on improving team management
The legend supports a call for change
Krishnamachari SrikkanthHis comments on his YouTube channel have ignited discussions about favoritism within the selection committee. He noted that while Gill continues to receive opportunities despite his mediocre performances, players like Suryakumar Yadav, Ruturaj Gaikwadand Sai Sudharsan They have been overlooked despite their impressive records in domestic cricket. Srikkanth emphasized that new talent should be promoted instead of sticking with players who do not deliver consistent results.
“I have always maintained that Shubman Gill is an overrated cricketer but no one listened to me. He is a very overrated cricketer. When Gill is given such a long rope… some people might wonder if even players like Suryakumar Yadav could have been given a longer rope in Tests.” Srikkanth stated.
The case of other talents
The argument for promoting other players is compelling. Gaikwad has performed exceptionally well in first-class cricket while Sudharsan has made waves during the ‘A’ tours. Their consistent performances raise questions as to why they are not considered for the national team when players like Gill continue to struggle.
Srikkanth’s claim that “Gill survives because he has ten chances and scores on the tenth chance.” resonates with many fans who feel that merit should dictate selection rather than past reputations or favoritism.
As India As you navigate a transitional phase in cricket, accountability within the selection committee becomes paramount. The current crop of players must be evaluated based on their performances, especially in challenging conditions such as those found in Australia. Selectors must recognize that while potential is important, consistent performance is crucial to success on the international stage.
Ricky PontingGill’s observations also reflect this sentiment. He noted that Gill needs to trust his instincts more and avoid overthinking his technique, which could contribute to his difficulties.